How football revenue impacts overall athletic department finances

Often, when people hear the phrase “Friday Night Lights,” they think of the football team, the marching band, and the roar of a crowd under stadium lights. But behind all of that spectacle lies a complex economic engine. High school and college football are not merely athletic events; they are financial ecosystems that shape the sustainability of entire athletic departments. 

As someone who has spent decades studying sport administration, I have seen firsthand how football revenues, as well as expenses, can determine the opportunities available to athletes across all sports.

The high school landscape: Community economics

At the high school level, football is often the single largest revenue-generating sport. Ticket sales, concessions, and booster donations tied to football games frequently outpace those of basketball, baseball, or even volleyball. In many districts, Friday night football is not just entertainment; it is a fundraising mechanism.

A well-attended football game can bring in thousands of dollars in ticket sales. Rivalry games or playoff contests may double or triple that figure. That is a significant economic impact alone.  However, add to the mix where local businesses often sponsor halftime events or advertise in game programs, creating a symbiotic relationship between schools and their communities, and that also has a financial impact as well. Moreover, Booster Clubs are significant. Football booster organizations are typically the most active, raising funds not only for the team but often for other sports as well. 

Paradoxically, in my experience working with both private-parochial Catholic high schools and public high schools, I’ve seen a clear difference in how each approaches alumni engagement and athletic revenue generation. Private Catholic schools tend to be far more organized and strategic, with well-established advancement offices and a culture that prioritizes alumni relationships. They regularly host events, maintain strong communication channels, and create a sense of tradition that encourages significant financial contributions to athletic programs. Public schools, on the other hand, often lack the same infrastructure and resources, relying heavily on booster clubs and occasional fundraisers. This makes their efforts less consistent and far less effective. Based on what I’ve observed, I strongly recommend that public schools learn from the private school model and find ways to piggyback on these proven strategies, such as building alumni networks, creating structured giving programs, and fostering a culture of long-term support. Doing so could dramatically improve their ability to sustain competitive athletic programs.

The irony in all of this, regardless of whether you are a private or public school, is that football is also one of the most expensive sports to maintain. Equipment costs such as helmets, pads, and uniforms are high, and safety regulations require frequent updates. Coaching stipends, travel, and stadium maintenance add further strain. Thus, while football revenue may subsidize other programs, it also consumes a disproportionate share of the budget.

College football: The powerhouse of athletic finance

At the collegiate level, football’s economic impact is magnified exponentially. For Division I programs, football is the financial foundation of the athletic department. Television contracts, ticket sales, merchandise, and alumni donations tied to football typically account for the majority of athletic revenue. For example, conferences negotiate lucrative television deals, with football as the centerpiece. These contracts can reach into the hundreds of millions, distributing funds across member institutions. In terms of gate receipts, stadiums seating 50,000 or more generate massive ticket and ultimately concession income as well. Premium seating, luxury boxes, and parking fees further expand these revenue streams. In terms of licensed merchandise, college football brands are national commodities. Jerseys, hats, and apparel sales contribute significantly to athletic budgets. One of the more overlooked yet most significant components is donor engagement. Football success often drives alumni giving. A winning season can spark fundraising campaigns that benefit not only athletics but also academic initiatives.

Yet, just as in high school, expenses are substantial. Coaching salaries at the Division I level can reach into the millions. Facilities arms races, such as new stadiums, training centers, and locker rooms, require constant investment. Scholarships, travel, and recruiting add further costs. For many universities, football is both the golden goose and the most demanding consumer of resources.

The subsidy effect: Football as a lifeline for other sports

One of the most important economic realities is that football often subsidizes non-revenue sports. Sports such as swimming, tennis, or track rarely generate significant income. Without football’s financial engine, many of these programs would struggle to exist.

At the high school level, football gate receipts may pay for new uniforms for the volleyball team or cover transportation costs for the soccer program. At the collegiate level, football revenue supports Title IX compliance, ensuring equitable opportunities for women’s athletics. In this way, football serves as both a cultural centerpiece and a financial lifeline.

Challenges and critiques

While football’s economic dominance is undeniable, it raises critical questions:

• Equity: Should one sport dictate the financial health of an entire department?
• Risk: What happens when football revenue declines due to poor performance and declining attendance, or decreased alumni support?
• Sustainability: The escalating costs of athletic facilities, in addition to coaches’ salaries and benefits, may outpace revenue growth, creating long-term financial instability.
• Health and Safety: Investments in equipment and medical staff are necessary, but they add to the expense ledger. As a result, balancing safety with financial realities is a constant challenge.

In essence, these critiques should remind us that while football is a powerful economic driver, it is not immune to broader financial pressures.

Hypothetically, consider a mid-sized university with a football program that unexpectedly wins its conference championship. It is plausible that attendance would surge, merchandise sales would skyrocket, and alumni donations would increase as well. Therefore, the athletic department suddenly has the resources to expand scholarships for women’s soccer, upgrade the baseball and softball fields, and hire additional staff for academic support services for the student-athletes. The success of one team creates an economic ripple effect across the entire athletic ecosystem.

» ALSO SEE: Preparing your fields for multiple sports

Conversely, a losing streak can have the opposite impact. Declining attendance and reduced donor enthusiasm may force budget cuts, affecting sports that have no direct connection to football. This volatility underscores the precarious dependence on football revenue. The future of football’s economic role is uncertain. At the high school level, concerns about player safety and declining participation may reduce revenue potential. At the collegiate level, the rise of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) agreements and conference realignment, in addition to the arrival of revenue sharing, are reshaping financial structures. Universities must adapt to new realities, balancing tradition with fiscal responsibility.

One promising trend is the diversification of revenue streams. Athletic departments are exploring digital media, esports, and expanded donor engagement to reduce dependence on football. While football will likely remain the centerpiece, a more balanced financial model may ensure long-term sustainability.

Conclusion: Football as an economic catalyst and challenge

Friday Night Lights symbolize more than athletic competition; they represent the economic heartbeat of athletic departments. From small-town high schools to major universities, football generates revenue, fosters community, and sustains opportunities for countless athletes. Yet, it also demands significant investment and carries inherent risks.

As sport administrators, our challenge is to harness football’s economic power responsibly. We must ensure that the benefits extend beyond the field of play, supporting diverse athletic opportunities and promoting equity. Football may be the engine, but the destination is a thriving, holistic athletic ecosystem.

You Might Also Like

Ole Miss Softball receives ‘championship-level’ facility upgrades

Hall of Fame coaches share how they led their teams to greatness

Buford (GA) High School sets new benchmark for athletic facilities