Cincinnati researchers find helmets don’t protect back of head
Eric Nauman tested a variety of helmets on test dummies and the findings were shocking.The protection was below 50% at the back of the head. For the front of the head, it was between 80-90%.
A recent story from WVXU.org spoke with Nauman about his study in the Journal of Biomechanical Engineering on football helmets and concussions.
Below is an excerpt from the WVXU.org story.
Nauman tested Schutt, Riddell, Xenith, and Vicis helmets on test dummies and tested dummies without helmets.
His team delivered 20 blows by hand at seven impact points to determine how much mitigation there was at every location of the helmet. By measuring the force applied to the dummy with and without the helmets, researchers could single out the strengths of each helmet design at each impact point, Nauman explains.
The study comes in the wake of rising concussion rates in the NFL, up 18% this last season.
“The classic one is that Tua Tagovailoa, when he’s playing the Bills. He fell backwards and hit his head on the ground,” says Nauman. “He clearly was impaired after that. We think that’s largely because that helmet doesn’t absorb a lot of the energy when it’s a blow to the back of the head.”
And then a couple of weeks later, while playing in Cincinnati, Nauman says “Tagovailoa got thrown to the ground, hit the back of his head, same exact location. And that had much more severe consequences.”
» ALSO SEE: LSU Athletics has $500M impact on local economy
In the past, WVXU has reported on research from Cincinnati Children’s researchers who were experimenting with protective collars for use in high school football and soccer.
Nauman says he doesn’t want to prevent anybody from playing football, he just wants to make the game safer for those who do want to play.
To read the full story from WVXU.org, click here.